Web Analytics Made Easy -
School Papers Theology

Martin Luther Freeing Christians

This paper discusses how the perceived failed reaction to Martin Luther on account of the Catholic Church may have been a proper reaction by the Pope to unite all Christians. The PDF would be nicer to read especially because there are informative footnotes.

The Protestant reformation was likely the most important event in European history. Caused by a series of events, but many claim the foundational basis to be propelled by Martin Luther’s infamous 95 theses.1 Luther’s statements were fairly easy for the common people to side with. Reflecting some modern views, like Calgary’s voters belief in regards to building a sports arena for our hockey team Luther questions the Pope “Again; why does not the pope, whose riches are at this day more ample than those of the wealthiest of the wealthy build one Basilica of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with that of poor believers?”2 Money comes up quite often in his theses, and as Luther repetitively points out the Church has no lack of funding. He is stating that the Pope is taking advantage of his position to goad citizens into paying for the redemption of their sins. This is putting a belief that the wealthier people have a better and quicker access to salvation as they were also able to pay away time in purgatory. Or even able to buy the ability to sin. After Luther came forward with his 95 theses the Pope and Rome were distracted with politics. This allowed for Luther to push his message forward before the Church was able to offer up an official response.3 The resting Pope, Leo the tenth issued a statement called the Exsurge Domine in retort to Luther’s 95 theses but he countered with only 41 condemnations against Luther’s letter. Luther was then called to Rome to recant his writings or else he would be punished with excommunication. Although all this seemed to accomplish was simply just confirming everything that Martin had believed.4 This becomes a defining moment as now Martin Luther feels vindication from within his writings. Not just for himself but for all those against the Church and the Pope. This was easily conveyed when he and his followers publicly burned the Pope’s Exsurge.5 In the Pope’s only writing directly against Martin Luther’s arguments, the Pope not just showed the current nature of the Church but even subtly offered support to dear Luther, “Christians must be taught to cherish excommunications rather than to fear them.”6 The new orientation Christians instilled in their lives from here on out have impacted the modern world so greatly that the Catholic Church seemingly was withholding the individual’s greatest potential.

Martin Luther’s 95 theses begins by condemning the Church’s act on the Pope redeeming sins of the people before reaching God. He talks about living and nonliving Christians who are hoping to reach salvation, the ultimate goal. The Pope is extorting the fear of the commoner of never achieving salvation to persuade the people into giving the Church their money.7 This was something that Luther himself had strong empathy for. Shortly after he became an ordained priest he had what he believed were trials of his spirit. During his studies he would become a victim of spells of depression and anguish that he believed came from his self guilt.8 Eventually Luther finds his saving grace in the meaning of “the justice of God.” His realization is that in terms of salvation, it did not matter his actions being holy or not. What was determining his ability to achieve salvation was only in the greatness of God.9 This forever remains in the back of his mind through his days. Eventually this confidence is mirrored against the Pope after his excommunication. Likely mirroring the new common belief regarding the Pope, Luther by 1520 no longer believed the Pope had any authority to send him to Hell.10

The Church’s initial response to Martin Luther was ultimately their undoing. First simply sending Luther a letter that did not acknowledge his document and put time writing in a few derogatory lines about the Augostinian Monk. This allowed for Luther to spread his message and have public debates, gaining much appeal to the German population.11 Pope Leo X eventually released a document in response to Martin Luther in 1520 titled Exsurge Domine which called for Luther to defend himself by recanting his writings or face excommunication. Pope Leo seemingly walking around the points Luther was making, while affirming them. “Indulgences are necessary only for public crimes, and are properly conceded only to the harsh and impatient.”12 It seems fairly easy to argue that the Pope is conceding that the Church is making case by case decisions, which is not something they should have the power to decide. The response from the Church was not received well because of the misconception of the meaning in Luther’s writing. The papal bull Exsurge seemed to be missing the mark for explaining the concerns brought up.13 What is a consistent point made by Luther that the public agreed on was the corruption within the Church. Most importantly he argued people must not think that their salvation is determinant on what the Church has decided for them.

Although Pope Leo X excommunicated Martin Luther from the Catholic Church he was vindicated by the people. Charles V, the new Emperor of Rome banned the writings of Martin Luther; Protestant Churches were being put up against the old churches, and his message still managed to spread across all of Europe.14 Not only was his message heard across the land but it seemed the majority of people who heard it were in favour of a reformation.15 As the reformation went through Europe people fond of the idea added on their own influence to better the new religion. Ideas that are likely tailored to favour their own community, they did help spark the revolution in their area. This is fairly important because what would help Protestants expand would be taken on as the main religion by a country’s monarchy.16 One’s faith had a tremendous impact on their lives. This factor was a catalyst of the transition. In Luther’s home country of Germany, towns were converting from Catholic to Protestant in months after his proposed reforms. There was so much hatred to the Catholic Church that their churches were vandalized and degraded.17 These acts were outward expressions of what Martin Luther expressed, that they were no longer scared of the Pope or the Church. Clear anger to demean their sacred places instead of just re-purposing or even smelting the material. The common people have felt betrayed, they have been watching the wealthy buy their way into heaven.18 The anger of the people has been fended off by the Church by the fear of God. Martin Luther’s tribulations over his salvation were on the minds of all people. Now not scared of what the Pope has to say people are fleeing their shackles in belief of a better life available.

Martin Luther did remain consistent in the principles of his writings being based on freedoms. The liberty of a people is always seen as a positive impact when we look back on history, and even in the Bible do we have people being freed by God. In the Exsurge Domine the Pope confirms that the people need not their Priest’s forgiveness of sins. They were now capable of detaching away from the Church which swindled them so. “Sins are not forgiven to anyone, unless when the priest forgives them he believes they are forgiven;”19 The Protestants are now taking the lead of Martin Luther, unafraid of the Pope and their salvation as they believe that with pure morals they will still be brought into the afterlife by God. This would lead to massive social change all over Europe. This was most effectively campaigned by Monarchs. The Tudor house of England maintained a Catholic rule over England. This changed however when political conflict eventually led to the Protestant Queen Elizabeth who established England as a Protestant nation.20 

This time period caused a lot of religious change. Most importantly was the new Christian idea on how gaining salvation works. Before there was an impediment from the Catholic Church, who were taking money to set up parishes and getting peasants to pay to get their loved ones out of purgatory, and giving a sell-able way out of sins. The Protestants now believed that they were individually able to decipher moral dilemmas for themselves based on scripture.21 Of course this made them in charge of their own standard, one we see today still is in work ethic. Sociologist Max Weber, credited the Protestant work ethic as the beginning reason for what started the industrial revolution, which in turn advanced society faster than ever before.22  The end goal of all people remained the same but the means of achieving it has changed to them. Instead of needing to appease anyone in the Church’s authority they could focus simply on their own lives. The poor people who detested the Church shared Martin Luther’s “intensified awareness of freedom” and used this realization to improve their lives, and seemingly mirrors the all for liberty attitude of America’s expansion in the coming centuries by Europe.23  

What has been uncovered from examining the conflict that began the Protestant reformation was the forced acknowledgement that there was corruption in the Church. They were using the fear of unknown afterlife to control the people and gain more power. Martin Luther, who was an Augustinian monk who became scared in prayer, causing depression in regards to his worries on his salvation. Realizing finally that salvation was not to be determined by the Holy order but only by God himself.24 This led to him directly questioning the Church on their hypocritical practices. The Pope would not back down. Perhaps unintentionally uniting Christians. Flipping the switch on what determines the ability to enter the afterlife. People were now inspired. Instead of giving up their bread crumbs to the Church they would save them, and make use. This slow accumulation of wealth showed the people how much more capable they really were. Now, all Christians are able to walk with their back straight, and confident that as long as they make proper use of their time, they will make God happy, maybe even impress him. People are now more willing to suffer for not just their own future, but others because they believe that their salvation depends on their own actions, not what the Church knows. The Catholic Church has wildly changed since Vatican 2. Maybe when we ask if these two Churches will ever make amends we should ask on how the Catholic Church can make it up to the Protestants. 


1.  Curt Cadorette, Catholicism in Social and Historical Contexts 124
2.  Martin Luther’s, 95 Theses, 86
3.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 216-217
4.  Berndt Hamm, Luther’s Freedom of a Christian and the Pope 250-251
5.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 219
6.  Exsurge Domine – Reason 24    
7.  Martin Luther, Ninety-Five Theses 
8.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 210
9.  Ibid. 211
10.  Curt Cadorette, Catholicism in Social and Historical Contexts 124
11.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 217-218
12.  Exsurge Domine – Line 21
13.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 220
14.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 221-222
15.  Thomas A. Fudge, In Praise of Heresy 27
16.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 222
17.  Curt Cadorette, Catholicism in Social and Historical Contexts 125
18.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 215 – He talks about how the Church is manipulating people, shouting for money in crowds reminding them of their relatives trapped in the flames of purgatory. Making it seem like Hell and they can save them by paying up.
19.  Exsurge Domine – Line 10. Meaning behind this line is that the Church is not forgiving sins. What they are doing is being an outlet for someone to confess to.
20.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 222 – The Queen ruled for nearly 50 years promoting Protestants over Catholics which started plenty of dialogue
21.  Curt Cadorette, Catholicism in Social and Historical Contexts 126
22.  Dr. Linda Henderson, Founding Fathers: Max Weber – Advancing all over, especially medicine and social laws
23.  Berndt Hamm, Luther’s Freedom of a Christian and the Pope 251
24.  Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church 210-211

Works Cited:

Bokenkotter, Thomas. A Concise History of the Catholic Church. Colorado Springs: The Doubleday Religious Publishing Group, n.d.

Cadorette, Curt. Catholicism in Social and Historical Contexts: an Introduction. New York: Orbis, 2010.

Fudge, Thomas A. “In Praise of Heresy: Hus, Luther, and the Ethos of Reformation.” The Journal of Religious History 43, no. 1 (March 2019): 25–44. 10.1111/1467-9809.12571 

Hamm, Berndt. “Luther’s Freedom of a Christian and the Pope.” Translated by Helon Heron and Martin J Lohrmann. Lutheran Church Quarterly 21, no. 3 (August 3, 2007): 249–67.

Henderson, Linda. “Founding Fathers: Max Weber” in Soci-201 An Introduction to Sociology, St. Mary’s University, March 6th, 2020. 

Pope Leo X, “Exsurge Domine.” Papal Encyclicals, April 27, 2017. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/leo10/l10exdom.htm.

Thatcher, Oliver J. The Library of Original Sources. Martin Luther 95 Theses Vol. 5. New York: University Research Extension, 1907.

4 replies on “Martin Luther Freeing Christians”

Good read… Religion has been rather new to me since 2017. Christianity has always been in the background because its everywhere. Having experienced what makes people create religions you can tell what is true and where people have manipulated the message. God gives the same message to everyone and it is expressed as morality but also logic and wisdom. Any self interest expressed over that is corruption of the message. That’s exactly what Martin Luther stood up against and I see it still is something that needs to be addressed even in modern times. It’s the rich and powerful steering the World but with greed and naivety and no concern for even their own surroundings because it’s a free for all. The only way to stand up to it is to make them and everyone else aware that eternal life is real.

Another way of stating what I mentioned in my first post without knowledge of the Universe is that everything around you will turn into dust. Even earth itself will turn to dust… You will turn to dust when your time is up. That dust is free to reform itself into something new and then that will return to dust. This cycle of dust to dust will eventually create you again… it will create a New Earth and you will experience something new while being oblivious to the old. There is a layer of complexity I’m withholding but it’s easier to grasp this way.

Not many people understand the Big Bang and entropy, mass, volume, atoms, etc. Its not necessary to know it but I understand it as classifications and organization of God. God the Father is omnipotent in everything but takes root in mind. It makes more sense that God is acting through biology and physics because it manifests as those things to create reality. I can’t say I’m panthiest because I don’t think the Universe is Gods true form… there’s another layer and that is a blank void. Kind of imagine walking around a dark room and thats exactly it but it has no boundries. When you make it to that state you can then notice how it remains nothing until you intervene with it and place something into that void. God does the same thing with reality… you can tear reality down to the void and know it takes intervention to place anything into it. God doesn’t dictate its creation… the Universe has freewill, Man has free will but God intervenes with Man through mind in pursuit of a better World for its constituents.

Comments are closed.